<cite id="d9bzp"></cite>
<cite id="d9bzp"><span id="d9bzp"></span></cite>
<cite id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"></video></cite><var id="d9bzp"></var>
<var id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"><thead id="d9bzp"></thead></video></var>
<menuitem id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"></video></menuitem>
<var id="d9bzp"></var><cite id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"></video></cite>
<cite id="d9bzp"></cite>
<var id="d9bzp"></var>
<var id="d9bzp"></var>
<var id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"><thead id="d9bzp"></thead></video></var>

论控审分离原则

时间:2017-08-08 法律毕业论文 我要投稿

摘   要

控审分离原则是现代刑事诉讼活动中的1项重要原则。我国现行的刑事诉讼法已经体现了控审分离原则的精神,但对于这1原则贯彻还不够彻底。在侦查、审查起诉和审判程序中还存在许多与该原则精神相背离的地方。界定控审分离原则的基本内涵,阐述其理论基础和意义,分析控审分离原则在我国司法实践中的现状,指出控审不分对我国法治的危害,并借鉴外国立法提出完善立法和司法的建议,无疑有利于我国刑事诉讼法制的现代化。

关键词:刑事诉讼基本原则;控审分离;不告不理;诉审同1

ABSTRACT

The separation principle between charge and interrogation is a cardinal principle in modern criminal prosecution activities. The existing code of criminal procedure has already embodied the spirit of this principle, but can hardly carry it out thoroughly. There are many issues which deviate from the very principle in reconnaissance, investigation, charge and interrogation and some other procedures. To define the basic connotation of this principle, elaborate its rationale and significance , analyze current situation of it in our judicial practice , point out the harm effects of indictment mixing with judgment in China’s rule by law, then profit from the foreign legislation and propose some suggestion to perfect the legislation and judiciary, will undoubtedly  beneficial to the modernization of Chinas criminal procedure legal system.

Keywords:the fundamental principle of criminal lawsuit; separation between accusation and interrogation; no trial without charge; identity of accusation and trial
..............................
注:【包括:毕业论文,任务书,开题报告

论控审分离原则相关推荐
云南快乐十分哪个好_北京pK怎么玩-湖北快3怎么玩 德鲁大叔| 冲锋车| 百度地图| 诺贝尔经济学奖| 那小子真帅| 陈明忠病危| 疯狂的赛车| 知网| 粮食安全白皮书| 今日新鲜事|