<cite id="d9bzp"></cite>
<cite id="d9bzp"><span id="d9bzp"></span></cite>
<cite id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"></video></cite><var id="d9bzp"></var>
<var id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"><thead id="d9bzp"></thead></video></var>
<menuitem id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"></video></menuitem>
<var id="d9bzp"></var><cite id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"></video></cite>
<cite id="d9bzp"></cite>
<var id="d9bzp"></var>
<var id="d9bzp"></var>
<var id="d9bzp"><video id="d9bzp"><thead id="d9bzp"></thead></video></var>

论表见代理

时间:2017-08-08 法律毕业论文 我要投稿

摘       要

表见代理制度的理论基础主要是;ど埔獾3人的合法权益及维护交易安全。在大陆法系中表见代理是学理归纳所得,而普通法系则称表见代理为不容否认的代理。我国《合同法》第49条的规定表明我国在立法上确认了表见代理制度,但构成要件这1环节在表见代理中还存在1些争议及瑕疵之处。本文即从“确立第3人的审核义务”、“合理限制相对人对义务人的选择权”和“无代理权人不得以无过错为由提出抗辩”这3项措施来阐述对表见代理的完善。

关键词:表见代理;合同法;要件;反思;完善

ABSTRACT


    The theoretical foundation of the prospectus is to protect the legal interests of a third party and the safety of the transaction. In the Civil Law system, the prospectus comes from the theoretical summary ; the Common Law system call it undeniable agency. The 49th term in Contract Law of China has affirmed the prospectus, but there are also many disputes and defects in the constitutive elements of prospectus. The thesis will prove how to consummate the prospectus from “establishing a third party,s obligation of examination”,“placing reasonable restriction on a bona fide counterpart,s selection” and “the representative without authority couldn,t claim its demur because of no fault ”.
 
Key word: Prospectus; Contract Law; Constitutive elements; Introspection; Consummate
..............................
注:【包括:毕业论文,任务书,开题报告

论表见代理相关推荐
云南快乐十分哪个好_北京pK怎么玩-湖北快3怎么玩 火星上有生命痕迹| 贾斯汀比伯| 刘诗雯| 三星note10| 亚冠| 法医秦明| 父母爱情| 炮炮兵| 雪莉今日进行尸检| 三国演义|